Books have become “increasingly pointless.”

Hey everyone, spend some time this weekend looking over this article┬ájust released by the Economist. The author addresses the popularity of e-books, and ways the publishing industry should change in order address the way books are transforming with new technology. Somewhere they mention that publishing houses are still important, but personally I don’t think they make a strong case. However, it’s interesting to consider the implications that Amazon has taken over the digital book publishing industry much in the same way Apple took over music downloading and Netflix seems to have a lockdown on streaming movies.

What does it mean for there to be this sort of monopoly on e-book distribution? It reminds me of the scene in If on a winter’s night a traveler when Calvino (or Marana? or you?) describes the “great fabricator of assembly-line novels” (130) and “novels and variants of novels as they are turned out by the computer” (128). Kind of eerie how Calvino was able to predict such a drastic change in the book industry as we are seeing now. Personally I think e-books are pretty genius, but as we’ve discussed, some books don’t translate well into this form…what is their fate? And most importantly, what is the fate of the Reader?

Welcome to Post-Print Fiction

Broken TypewriterThis is the class blog for ENGH 400:002.

The name of the class is post-print fiction.

Nobody really knows what I mean by “post-print” fiction.

But we are going to try to find out.

Our roadmap, to borrow a metaphor, is in two parts, verso and recto, to borrow another metaphor. Verso: the course guidelines. And recto: the class calendar.

Also, delight in the 1-page visual overview to the syllabus.

(Broken Typewriter courtesy of wvs. Creative Commons Licensed)