Searchers: Fun Home

http://www.houghtonmifflinbooks.com/booksellers/press_release/bechdel/

I thought there was lots of good stuff here. Some of it just explains why the book was written and that sort of thing, but the interview is interesting and the comments from other writers at the top is charming.

Just a nice read, I thought

Searchers- Fun Home and other disturbing families in graphic novels

When I first saw Fun Home on the syllabus, I mistook it for another novel revolving around a daughter and father called Daddy’s Girl.  Daddy’s Girl  is an incredibly disturbing, semi-auto-biographical, account of incest. It originally ran as a strip in New York Press in the 90’s, and was published in 1995. It won the Ignatz Award, fell out of print, but is now available in hard back form as of 2008, a testament to the power of the story.  The author’s family unfortunately completely denies any abuse took place, but Dreschler’s sister who witnessed most of the abuse (although was not abused herself) acts as a witness to the veracity of the author’s story. Her parents, and the rest of her family except for her one sister, stopped speaking to her after the strip was published. The strips feature the protagonist “Lily” being sexually abused on a nightly basis by her father while her sister pretends to sleep. Lily’s father makes her feel guilty about the abuse (as many abusers do, tragically layering guilt onto the pain of the abuse itself) and she feels that she is the “seducer” and tries to protect her mother from the truth, although it’s suggested throughout the novel that her mother may be aware of it.  The second part of the novel features a girl named “Franny” who is raped by a drug dealer in the woods, and then becomes consumed with guilt and shame for placing herself in the situation that resulted in the attack. Both protagonists are vulnerable girls (Franny is the lonely, new girl in town, desperate to make friends) suffering at the hands of older, male abusers. There are some parallels between Fun Home and Daddy’s Girl in the exploration of the relationship between father’s and daughters, how painful the truth can be, the denial of dysfunction and the desperation to appear normal to the outside world.

Just to be clear, this book is very graphic and very disturbing.  I felt nauseated reading it, and you can’t easily shake the dirty feeling away after the book ends.

http://talkingwithtim.com/wordpress/2008/04/28/debbie-drechsler-on-daddys-girl/   Interview with author from 2008 when the book was re-printed.

Another better interview, from Vice from 1996 when the strips first came out  http://www.viceland.com/blogs/en/2006/05/22/ten-years-ago-in-vice-daddys-little-slut/#more-4407

Searchers- Fun Home

http://www.marshallnews.com/story/1193923.html

Found this little gem after a quick search.  Craig Thompson was mentioned in the Freedman article; sounds like we may want to check that out once we’re done with papers and such.  The body of the story caught my attention because the jist of both side’s arguments is “doing what’s best for the kids” or thereabouts.  It seems people still can’t get over the fact that adults read comic books.  There was really no reason for the books to be in the kid’s section in the first place.  There needs to be some kind of Reading Corps, classifying and placing books by actually reading and fairly analyzing them, because no one with the job of shelving these things seems willing to crack open the pages.  Any thoughts from you guys?

Respondent-Shannon-Bechdel’s Feelings about her Dad

I was glad that the first reader brought up Bechdel’s ponderings about her own objectivity in characterizing her dad, and how much of his identity is just her wishful thinking. One of the reasons I think I like this novel so much is that it doesn’t fall into the trap that many books dealing with sexuality do; excessive labeling with no thought about the labels themselves. So often, a character will decide that he or she is “gay,” with no real explanation of what they are actually naming in themselves. I’m of the opinion that human sexuality is way too complex to be accurately described by the terms “gay,” “straight,” or “bisexual,” and so most authors who use these terms are inherently problematic to me.

And at first, I felt like Fun Home was veering in that same direction. Alison of the story, in fact, discovers the label before she even has the experiences normally associated with it: “a revelation not of the flesh, but of the mind” (pg 74). But there’s a difference here; Bechdel is not, as an author, saying that lesbians are actually a discrete  class of people, not suggesting that there was anything that truly seperated her from others, but simply portraying how she self-identified and how it helped her find belonging.

The reason I suspect that the Bechdel of today has a more complex view of sexuality is that she puts it in her book, but she lets this theory come from her fathers’ mouth, not hers. At one point, he asks, “Do you have to put a label on yourself?” (pg 211) Alison doesn’t seem to gain much from his words when he says them, but they’ve obviously stuck with Bechdel the author, shown in the later musing that the first reader noted: she recognizes that she may have been hasty “to claim him as ‘gay’ in the way I am ‘gay,’ as opposed to bisexual or some other category” (pg 230).

Although gay men and lesbians are largely portrayed in this book as true communities, seperate from the mainstream and with certain easy-to-identify characteristics, I appreciated that there are some glimpses of the idea that this is not the way things always are, or have to be. I also appreciated that Bechdel recognized those ideas were not hers at the time the story, and therefore attributes them appropriately to her father.

First Readers – Bechdel’s feelings about her dad

After our class discussion yesterday, I thought I’d look a little closer at Bechdel’s feelings about her father and his suicide. Bechdel obviously yearns for a strong connection to her dad and feels the loss of him keenly.  There’s an early scene of Bechdel getting a bath and she notes that the baths given to her by her father are the ones that she remembers the most:  “The suffusion of warmth as the hot water sluiced over me … the sudden unbearable cold of its absence” (22).  This is about more than hot water, of course.  She was warmed by the attention of her father and chilled when he left her through suicide.

There are many panels that directly address the bond she hopes exists, but which she cannot yet substantiate.  We see this doubt at the top of page 84 when she questions whether telling her parents about being gay is what led to her father’s suicide.  She says that’s illogical, however, because “causality implies connection, contact of some kind … [and] you can’t lay hands on a fictional character”, meaning how can you connect with an illusion.  Page 86 expresses her hope for a connection in a way that is darkly poignant – she wants his death to be about her so that she can hold onto “that last tenuous bond”.  I think her honestly here is amazing – I’m not sure that I could admit to something like that.  Another example comes at the end of the book, when she writes “Perhaps my eagerness to claim his as ‘gay’ … is just a way of keeping him to myself – a sort of inverted oedipal complex” (230).

We see this hopeful yet distant relationship best in the closing panels of most chapters, which often show them together but separate.  For instance, in chapter 3, they are in the same room, but seen through different windows pursuing their own interests (86).  Also, the snapshots of her and her father at the end of chapter 4 show us two different pictures, but highlight their similarities to each other. Chapter 5 is another great example which shows Bechdel and her dad watching a sunset together (150).  The way she is leaning toward him shows her yearning to be close, which sadly is not something he seemed ready to accept.

Searchers – Fun Home

On the back of the book “Fun Home” I noticed a website. I went to check out the comics this author has drawn and I was surprised at how different the tone of the comics are from the book. If you have the time I would suggest giving at least a couple of the strips a read, it might add a new perspective on the rest of “Fun Home.”

http://dykestowatchoutfor.com/strip-archive-by-number

Searchers : uzumaki to Film

As many famous Japanese mangas, Uzumaki was also made into film.

There are some clips from this movie on youtube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fd8a6BJT2cc&feature=related

Ny times calls this movie very dissapointing portray of the manga. They claim that film has failed to captivate the most essential parts of the comic.

NYtime Review on the movie :

http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9903EFDB1731F932A35756C0A9649C8B63

It is interesting to see the transition of the manga into movie and how they often fail to capture the most essential parts of the manga.

Alyse M. Jones — Searcher — Junji Ito interviews

This site has a very interesting and personal fan-conducted interview with Junji Ito:

http://samehat.blogspot.com/2009/01/fantastic-interview-with-junji-ito.html

I really enjoyed this interview because it is so personal and you feel like you are standing in his home with his studio with him.
Quick summary quoted from site:

“Highlights from this fantastic and casual look into Junji Ito’s life & work include:

* Ito-san showing off his original script outlines and rough panel layouts, with descriptions of his process when creating manga.

* A long discussion of the influence of urban legends on Ito’s manga, how he got the idea and visual inspiration for Tomie, and how he became a manga artist.

* A tour of Junji Ito’s studio and art desk, process using mirrors and photo-references in his work, and much more!”

Respondents: Paying Attention to Detail

A lot of the first reader posts discussed the incorporation of texts and images and how they mostly seem to blur or skew themselves, as well as the incorporation of the clear images of brands or photographs. Jessica pointed out in her first reader post that McCloud wrote “the more defined the artwork, the less relatable to the reader,” which was definitely the case for me while reading. It was a little unnerving to me to see these things that seemed so out realistic and out of place in a world that was clearly full of anguish. The mixed media artwork reminded me a lot of zine art as well, and usually I would think of the blurriness of the artwork as a soft thing, but here there is a significant harshness or crudeness (not only in the content) to it. The yellow hues remind me a lot of acid as well, which I think mirrors the deterioration of Omar’s mental state. I found that the distorted images drew me in more and had me paying more attention to the detail in those pages, while the clear images of brands or photographs jolted me out of the graphic novel, even though those distortions didn’t really have a lot of detail to begin with.

It was definitely a completely different experience than any graphic novel that I’ve read. I was frustrated and annoyed reading it the first time, but after the second time, I found myself really enjoying it and understanding that the things that I found annoying were…kind of the point?

Response: Strangeness in My Darkest Hour

The book may seem strange in many ways, but to me it’s a complete reflection of how disturbing and dark real life can be. Life isn’t four neatly drawn panels on a page; it’s gritty, raw, and completely disconnected. Santiago did an excellent job displaying that for us here, taking us to the deep recesses of Omar’s thoughts, thoughts that any person could have at any given time. It’s the darkness itself that provides us with an interesting story where, because without it Omar is simply just another uncommitted individual with normal human tendencies. We read this novel because we want to see Omar spiral (no relation to Uzumaki) into oblivion, we want to see him hit rock bottom, because that’s where the drama is and that is what’s entertaining. If this novel had been neatly drawn like American Born Chinese, there would be a completely different opinion on it. But through Santiago’s dark and disturbing style, he provides us with something so much more, because in all honesty not a whole lot happens in terms of actual story. The fact that Santiago blended these dark images with the subliminal enhances its more realistic approach and kept us in reality when at times it seemed we were drifting further and further away from it. It is my opinion that this book is the closest to reality that we’ve read yet and really causes one to reflect on his or her life. Even that alone says a lot about this novel.

Searchers: More Uzumaki and a little Santiago

I found a small interview with Junji Ito on youtube and he talks about the manga and the movie Uzumaki a bit as well as a  little bit about his other horror manga.

Also to add to Leon’s link about the Uzumaki movie, here’s a link to a review for the movie. Beware: there are images from the movie and some are a little graphic.

Junji Ito interview

Uzumaki

As for Wilfred Santiago, I found his official site if anyone is interested. You do have to click around a little as when you first get to the site it’s blank.  Although there doesn’t seem to be much on the site.

Wilfred Santiago

Searchers- Interview with Santiago about his Roberto Clemente graphic novel biography

http://www.bugsandcranks.com/the-clubhouse/baseball/an-interview-with-wilfred-santiago-author-of-21-a-graphic-novel-about-roberto-clemente/

 

Wilfred Santiago’s graphic novel, 21, about the life of Roberto Clemente came out in 2008, unbeknownst to me. I was somewhat surprised that Santiago is  an avid baseball fan, with the impression I gathered from him after reading In my Darkest Hour.  He mentions in the interview that 21 reveals his influences and passions before getting into comics, and that he began collecting baseball cards at the same time he started collecting comic books. Santiago’s other books are erotic graphic novels; Pink and The Thorn Garden, clearly he’s an eclectic writer. The common thread between his stories seem to be the biographical (or auto-biographical) material.  At the end of the interview he shares a response in line with my assumptions about his personality: 

“I do have some issues with the institution of organized baseball, professional sports in general. Too many things turn me off. So I don’t enjoy watching baseball as much as I liked playing it as a child.”

Santiago; not a fan of institution.