Author Archives: jwave

First Readers – Bechdel’s feelings about her dad

After our class discussion yesterday, I thought I’d look a little closer at Bechdel’s feelings about her father and his suicide. Bechdel obviously yearns for a strong connection to her dad and feels the loss of him keenly.  There’s an early scene of Bechdel getting a bath and she notes that the baths given to her by her father are the ones that she remembers the most:  “The suffusion of warmth as the hot water sluiced over me … the sudden unbearable cold of its absence” (22).  This is about more than hot water, of course.  She was warmed by the attention of her father and chilled when he left her through suicide.

There are many panels that directly address the bond she hopes exists, but which she cannot yet substantiate.  We see this doubt at the top of page 84 when she questions whether telling her parents about being gay is what led to her father’s suicide.  She says that’s illogical, however, because “causality implies connection, contact of some kind … [and] you can’t lay hands on a fictional character”, meaning how can you connect with an illusion.  Page 86 expresses her hope for a connection in a way that is darkly poignant – she wants his death to be about her so that she can hold onto “that last tenuous bond”.  I think her honestly here is amazing – I’m not sure that I could admit to something like that.  Another example comes at the end of the book, when she writes “Perhaps my eagerness to claim his as ‘gay’ … is just a way of keeping him to myself – a sort of inverted oedipal complex” (230).

We see this hopeful yet distant relationship best in the closing panels of most chapters, which often show them together but separate.  For instance, in chapter 3, they are in the same room, but seen through different windows pursuing their own interests (86).  Also, the snapshots of her and her father at the end of chapter 4 show us two different pictures, but highlight their similarities to each other. Chapter 5 is another great example which shows Bechdel and her dad watching a sunset together (150).  The way she is leaning toward him shows her yearning to be close, which sadly is not something he seemed ready to accept.

Searchers: Two interesting reviews

I found a couple of great reviews on JSTOR.

Review One:

The first is a cartoon review of Persepolis 1 & 2, by Jennifer Camper.  It’s not only interesting, but it’s also quite funny and insightful.  For instance, in the first frame, two Iranian women are in a bookstore and one says to the other, “I see we’re still the flavor of the month” (8).  Later one of the women laments the fact that it took “an attack on America to get people interested in our stories” (8).  The book review itself touches not only on the politics and culture of this memoir, but also the artistic process behind it all.  I’ll bring in a copy for class.

Source: The Women’s Review of Books, Vol. 21, No. 12 (Sep., 2004), pp. 8-9

Published by: Old City Publishing, Inc.

Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4024475

Review two:

For those interested in additional reading from the Iranian woman’s perspective, I recommend reading this review by Nahid Mozaffari, who writes that “memoirs are to the publishing industry what reality shows are to television” (516). We’ve touched briefly on these books during class:

  • Journey from the Land of No:  A Girlhood Caught in Revolutionary Iran, by Roya Hakakian
  • Lipstick Jihad:  A Memoir of Growing Up Iranian in America and American in Iran, by Azadeh Moaveni
  • Embroideries, by Marjane Satrapi

In addition to reviewing each book, Ms. Mozaffari offers some interesting details about the cultural and political reasons why Iranian memoirs are so popular right now.  For instance, she believes that for Americans confused by the history and politics of the area, it is “easier to look at the different cultures and difficult problems through the lens of one person at a time” (517).

It’s a long-ish review, but well-worth your time.

Source: Women’s Studies Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 1/2, The Global & the Intimate (Spring – Summer, 2006), pp. 516-527

Published by: The Feminist Press at the City University of New York

Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40004783

Chinese, anyone? Stereotyping with a purpose.

What a difference from our last read!  The novel and its message are pretty simplistic  (especially after Jimmy Corrigan) and explores feelings of cultural identity, alienation, and eventual self-acceptance.  In American Born Chinese, Gene Yang weaves together the stories of three characters as they work to overcome feelings of shame in their search for identity – the Monkey King, Jin Wang, and Danny. As half-Asian myself, I found this a very interesting read.  I spent my early years in 1970s Kansas (not exactly a wellspring of tolerance then) and can certainly relate to the inner turmoil that can arise when you look different.

The most difficult (and, well…funny) chapters to read featured Chin-Kee and some over-the-top racial stereotyping, which applies not just to Asians, but also to Danny and other Americans.  Chin-Kee’s squinty eyes, manner of dress and speech (those transposed Ls and Rs just made me wince), and buckteeth are all familiar stereotypes.  To really round it out, Chin-Kee’s luggage looks like Chinese take-out cartons (48) and for lunch he eats “clispy flied cat gizzards wiff noodle” (114).  Of course, Jin Wang is afraid that these ideas will be applied to him, making him reject not only his culture and best friend, but also his very being.  The stereotyping doesn’t end there, however.  Blond, blue-eyed Danny is the epitome of American youth, along with Steve, the strong, but simple jock (although I thought he was kinder than most stereotypes of dumb jocks).  Also, some of the teachers were portrayed as ignorant and culturally insensitive, a big American stereotype, which hopefully is not as true today as it was in the past.  This can be seen as they introduce Jin Wang and Wei-Chen to their classes (pages 30 and 36, respectively).

I think Gene Yang uses all of this stereotyping to make a point about people’s perceptions of others and of themselves.  When you are part of a group that is often mocked for their culture and appearance, it’s hard not to internalize it and start believing it yourself. Yang experienced this growing up and had to learn how to be comfortable in his own body. As the Monkey-King says to Jin, “Now that I’ve revealed my true form, perhaps it is time to reveal yours” (213).

Respondent: What about those peaches?

I really enjoyed reading bfleser’s post and agree with much of it, although you are much kinder about Jimmy’s “awkwardness” than I’m going to be.  First, those damn peaches.  I found the recurring symbol of peaches important in showing Jimmy’s repressed sexual nature.  Peaches have long been associated with female genitalia and sexuality and I believe that this may explain why it keeps popping up in the book. The description of the peach by the old man in the airport says it all:  “A soft, single-seeded stone fruit, with a pinkish, red-tinted downy skin and moist, dewy flesh”.  Peaches are either out of Jimmy’s reach or he avoids them.  For instance, we first see the peach dangling high above the scene showing a bloody Amos, killed by his father because of the missing truck, the truck that would transport Jimmy to his first date and possibly toward a sexual encounter.  On the next page, we see Jimmy as the robot, leaning as far from the peach tree as possible (this may be a stretch, as it could simply be Jimmy slumped over in sleep).  Also, in a flashback scene, James eats sugar infested with bugs rather than eating a fresh, ripe, juicy peach.  I find it interesting that most, if not all of his thoughts about women end with them cuddling, rather than having sex.  Even his imagination recoils from the thought!

So, I think Jimmy Corrigan is a sexually repressed boy-man with a highly active and very disturbing imagination.  He has been seriously damaged by his relationship with his overbearing mother, as we can see from his unfortunate attraction to the equally overbearing Peggy, from his office.  In fact, women in positions of authority seem to turn him on (witness his fantasy about the doctor). His uneasiness with women is matched only by his hostility toward them.  Of course, they seem to constantly reject him and not in a kind way (Peggy and the woman on the plane who accuses him of staring at her breasts are two examples), so this is perhaps understandable.  This love/hate is reflected in Jimmy’s (Chris Ware’s?) borderline misogyny and objectification of women, which runs through much of the book.  This is first seen in the comments of his male co-worker:  “I’ve made it my personal rule not to tell any chick I like her until I’ve fucked her at least six times”, a sentiment closely echoed by his father later in the book – “never tell ‘em you like ‘em until you’ve ‘done’ ‘em”.  And it doesn’t help that his dad then says “How’s your mother, by the way?”, a comment sure to add to Jimmy’s sexual confusion by forcing him to see his mother as a sexual object.  Soon after this, Jimmy’s imagination has him in bed with a “cocktease whore” who had the temerity to say ‘no’ to his sexual advances because she doesn’t feel ready.  And, again, when he listens to the tape recording of the couple walking by arm-in-arm (the woman says to the man, “You’re the most wonderful guy I’ve ever met…I think I might be falling in love with you”), his response is to laugh (bitterly, I think) and call the woman a “bitch”. All of this shows his skewed vision of women, which probably stems from his abusive past.

Jimmy is a mess.  While I do have some sympathy for him, he makes me terribly uncomfortable.  His mild manner belies a seething cauldron of fury ready to explode at any moment.  If I were Tammy (the new girl in his office) I would ask to switch desks.

Searchers – History and Memory After Auschwitz

Dominick LaCapra’s book History and Memory after Auschwitz traces the impact of the Holocaust on survivors, perpetrators, and the generations of people who came after them.  There is a great chapter on Maus that discusses a number of topics, including the use of animals to create some distance between the reader and the horrific details of the Holocaust; and the personalities and difficult relationship between father and son.  The book is not available at the GMU library, unfortunately.  But there is a Google books version that is pretty comprehensive.  There are some pages left out, but you can find most of the chapter pages.

Here’s the link: http://bit.ly/3UC0lb

Also, here’s a 1991 review by Lawrence Langer of the NY Times (spoiler alert:  if you have not read Maus II I suggest you do not read this article right away).  Langer writes quite a bit about the relationship between Vladek and Artie, as well as their struggle with the loss of Richieun:  “nearly every Holocaust testimony, written or oral, provides [the same melancholy answer]: the dead, those who did not return, have the last word. How could it be otherwise?

http://www.nytimes.com/books/98/12/06/specials/spiegelman-maus2.html

First Readers – Details and Double Meanings

I was immediately struck by the significance of Rorschach’s name and mask, which obviously derive from the famous Hermann Rorschach and the inkblot test.  The meaning seems quite clear:  whatever judgments you are making about this superhero reflect more on you than it does on him.  I will confess to staring at the changing patterns of his mask for an embarrassingly long time, looking for some clue to his character or purpose, but to no avail (Chapter 1, pages 12 and 15 offer a good look at his ever-changing “face”). Scott McCloud, in Chapter Five, writes:  “Certain patterns can produce an almost physiological effect in the viewer … [who] for some reason … will ascribe those feelings, not to themselves, but to the characters they identify with” (132). He was writing this about background patterns, but I think it can also apply to Rorschachs’s distinctive inkblot mask. In other words, Rorschach alone carries no true meaning – we project our own thoughts and feelings on him.  Having said that, it seems best to read the whole novel before making any judgments about Rorschach…or yourself .

The mystery of Rorschach is just the beginning of the many curiosities this novel contains. One has to be constantly aware of seemingly innocuous details that may have some meaning later.  For instance, there is an interesting play-on-words, often with double meaning, that runs throughout the novel, from the seemingly incidental to the brazenly obvious.  On page 9 of chapter one, there is a sign from a mechanic’s shop that reads “We fix ‘em!  Obsolete models a specialty”.  This certainly refers to more than just automobiles and foreshadows the many images of aging superheros in the pages that follow.   In chapter three, we see the locksmith from the “Gordian Knot Lock Co.” (the OED Online defines a Gordian knot as “A matter of extreme difficulty. To cut a Gordian knot: to get rid of a difficulty by force.”) – more foreshadowing.   Newspaper headlines also play a distinctive role as part of a secondary story about an impending international crisis (examples:  Chapter 1, page 18, chapter 2, pages 5, 9,10).

Another interesting example of this device is found in the parallel story lines of Dr. Manhattan and the pirate comic in chapter three.  This can be clearly seen in the closely mirrored narration of the comic and the experiences of Dr. Manhattan after he goes to Mars:  “That night, I slept badly beneath cold, distant stars, pondering upon the cold, distant god in whose hands the fate of Davidstown rested” (21).  Probably the best example of duality is again found in chapter three where images and dialogue from Dr. Manhattan’s interview coincide eerily with the assault on Laurie and Dreiberg.  For instance, when Dr. Manhattan is asked “Doc, if the reds act up in Afghanistan … will you be prepared to enter hostilities?” (page 12).  The last part of the sentence is superimposed on the image of Laurie and Dreiberg as they face their assailants.

There are so many examples (such as the sugar cubes) that it would take a book to recount them all, I’m sure.  And, I’ve only read through chapter 3!