Category Archives: Group 7

You both bring up good points. Britt, you end with a good point I hadn’t really thought of. Yes, the ending does seem to be happy in that both protagonists are reunited with their families, but to a 1920s audience, the return of people to their “proper places” could be the main positive aspect of the ending. Continue reading →

What a great reading of “The Comet” using one simple concept (water) as your lens! This technique shows the power of connecting a close reading of a single word (or related words) to the broader theme of the text.

I also like how your focus on the natural imagery (something you did effectively with Frankenstein too) illustrates that nature is not simply a backdrop to the story, but part of its very essence. I think we could apply a similar technique to the imagery of the Antarctic in “Who Goes There”… Continue reading →

You make a lot of good points with regard to how DuBois treats race relations in THe Comet. I agree that there is a definant segregation in both the beginning and the end of the story. Not just between the Jim and Julia, but between Jim and the world around him.
The bank president, in particular, is shown to be “above” Jim in how he “smiled patronizingly” at Jim in the very beginning of the story. The fact that a bank president would treat anyone not of similar social stature this way isn’t the point, though. The point is that Jim feels alone in the world, that he is “Nothing!”
The middle of the story goes a long way to keep him apart, even as the two primary characters work together to get through the horrible time they are forced to endure together. At one point, Jill realizes she’s alone with a stranger, and worse, “with a man alien in blood and culture.” DuBois doesn’t really want us to get too comfortable with the idea of blacks and whites interacting too closely.
The one moment that the two have that feels comfortable is at the end of the tale, when they’re looking at each other on top of the Metropolitan Tower. She’s has just had the epiphany that they will be the mother and father of the new human race. He feels like a risen Pharaoh, a god among men. She sees herself as this man’s mate, and he sees himself holding a scepter.
While I feel like this particular scene is forced and completely melodramatic in so many ways, it was an effort by the author to set things not equal, but to put the black man in a position of dominance.
He then brings Jim’s dream crashing down around him with the honking of a car horn and the bursting of a rocket. Suddenly, Julia’s father and fiance are there and we’re back to reality. Jim is just a black man who is too close to a white woman for some white’s comfort. The division of the people showing up on the roof feels more to me like hope, then it does anything else. Hope for a future where a black man could be alone with a white woman without calls for a lynching.
And then Jim sees the black woman with the dead baby, and is overjoyed that she’s alive. I think this final ending to the story sets everything back “the way it should be” with regards to race. This ending would have made the story more agreeable to a white audience in 1920. Their suspension of disbelief to enjoy the Science Fiction story is brought abruptly back to reality with Jim’s “sob of joy.” Continue reading →

You make a lot of good points with regard to how DuBois treats race relations in The Comet. I agree that there is a definite segregation in both the beginning and the end of the story. Not just between the Jim and Julia, but between Jim and the world … Continue reading →

I wonder if the story really suggests that Jim and the woman can truly ever be equals. I’m thinking of when Jim brings her food, and she ate “what he served” (268). How does that reference to serving complicate the notion that equality can ever be achieved? Continue reading →