Category Archives: Group 5

Separation

I may be imagining this incorrectly, but it seems to me the characters in Neuromancer are able to separate their consciousness (or soul) from their body. Granted, they have to plug into the matrix or have special chips installed into their bodies to be able to do this it’s not like they can just decide, […] Continue reading

Posted in Group 5 | Tagged | Comments Off on Separation

Addiction

One of the challenges for me in reading Neuromancer is in trying to understand the culture that the characters are living in. Although it’s vividly portrayed, because Gibson doesn’t spend too much time explaining what things are (and because, although I enjoy science fiction, I’m not really that ‘technologically minded’) I have a hard time […] Continue reading

Posted in Group 5 | Tagged | Comments Off on Addiction

Interactive Internet?

Neuromancer throws the reader into the futuristic world of genetic re-engineering and cyberwarfare and forces adaptation to the new world while it sprints ahead at breakneck speed. Originally, I envisioned Case “jacking in” in the same manner as portrayed by … Continue reading Continue reading

Posted in Group 5 | Tagged | Comments Off on Interactive Internet?

Departing from the norm…

After hearing and reading a bit about William Gibson and his influence on the science fiction genre, I was pretty excited to begin reading Neuromancer. I for one wasn’t expecting what was prepared for me. Granted, when seeing the prompt, … Continue reading Continue reading

Posted in Group 5 | Tagged | Comments Off on Departing from the norm…

Disorientation of Time in Neuromancer

I find that William Gibson portrays a time-disorienting opening to his cyberpunk novel, Neuromancer.  Part I, Chiba City Blues consists of a jumpy, speed-like nature in which many details are skipped across quickly.  At first, this rapidness appears … Continue reading

Posted in Group 5 | Tagged | Comments Off on Disorientation of Time in Neuromancer

Response to jdougla8: “Who’s the villain?”

“Julia, this blog post inspires the question, who is the monster and who is the victim? Yet, I feel that you conclude that Frankenstein is the true monster. Frankenstein and the creature have both harmed each other unto the point of death, but th… Continue reading

Posted in Group 5 | Tagged | Comments Off on Response to jdougla8: “Who’s the villain?”

The Cyber novel Neuromancer

            I had typed up most of my blog on Friday, but when I noticed the email with the blog prompt about why Neuromancer is difficult, I figured I could change my blog to focus more on that question.             William Gibson is arguably the father of the Sci-fi sub-genre Cyberpunk. But, what is Cyberpunk? […] Continue reading

Posted in Group 5 | Tagged | Comments Off on The Cyber novel Neuromancer

Response to jdougla8

The argument that McReady has a suspiciously knowledgeable understanding of the monster and its effects upon the individual/s in inhabits is based on the manner in which he expresses his ideas. When concocting the experiment to prove the humanity of … Continue reading Continue reading

Posted in Group 5 | Tagged | Comments Off on Response to jdougla8

Comment on Secret Monsters by Chris Jones

This is indeed a very interesting perspective, and going back to read it from this angle is well worth your time. Though from that initial quote on the last page, I thought that McReady was just musing on the idea of there being more creatures that came from other planets, just as any one common person thinks about such things. But as you have pointed out, it is very well possible that the creature have been in McReady from near the beginning. The argument for this possibility stands strongest on page 24 when he says “It must be a peaceable thing, in its own – inimitable -way. It never
had to, because it always gained its end – otherwise.” Though its true the confidence exuded from McReady is evident throughout the story, this comment is nonetheless one that caused me to look back over a second time. Why would he suggest such a thought, that the monster may have already gained its end. Van Wall’s response confirms this: “You’re suggesting then, that perhaps it already has the greater numbers, but is just waiting – waiting, all of them – all of you, for all I know – waiting till I, the last human, drop my wariness in sleep.” Teasing out this possibility that McReady is indeed a monster, this comment fits right it. He, as a monster, using this ability to shape-shift, is just waiting for the opportune moment, and is instead actually inside of most of the humans anyway. While this thought in the story is quickly moved from, it is an interesting thought to pull out nonetheless. Continue reading

Posted in Group 5 | Comments Off on Comment on Secret Monsters by Chris Jones

Comment on Secret Monsters by engh451blog

While I do agree that McReady does seem very persceptive of the abilities and thoughts of the “monster” the omission in one of your quotes does leak some of its strength: “It cannot animate a dead body, apparently” (22). This bit of uncertainty does not refute your claim, with which I happen to share a line of thought, it does follow logically the process through which a human being would explain something to which he/she had drawn a hypothesis. He generally makes assumptions based upon data of how the creature has reacted which lends itself to the believe that he is simply a intelligent and abstract thinker. Continue reading

Posted in Group 5 | Comments Off on Comment on Secret Monsters by engh451blog